Live as a gene or as a meme
https://assets.st-note.com/production/uploads/images/2458650/profile_2623cf78371091c73b080c7c7566aac7.jpg?fit=bounds&format=jpeg&quality=85&width=330
Live as a gene or as a meme | Flocro | note
Eating (≒ working)
Reproduction
Education
Play (opposite of "work")
Pursuing anti-genetic drive is also promoting activities in the language world, so it is a logical world and sometimes leads to conclusions that are far from intuition.
Also, pursuing anti-genetic drive lowers the priority of genes (that is, expands the boundary of self-preservation that spreads concentrically around oneself) and makes it easier to expand the range of treating the value of life equally.
However, it is impossible to live purely according to anti-genetic drive. This is because living itself is motivated by genetic drive.
Living purely according to anti-genetic drive means giving up self-preservation and dying as information.
If genetic drive is moving to leave children, what will anti-genetic drive try to leave? It is probably a "meme(meme)". It can be seen that genetic drive and anti-genetic drive are not necessarily mutually exclusive. It may be a requirement for a good life and death to continue to consider better life and death while cooperating with both.
hr.icon
I collected tweets that seem to be easier to understand than the author's own.
It is almost inevitable that working hard on creation will lead to death, because sacrificing oneself to a meme is almost the same as going against the genetic command. The motives of genes and aesthetics are working independently, but there is only one body to carry them out. https://t.co/hjsGbaJE7i