power and modes of exchange
https://gyazo.com/20120df5d585ee3068327563ebee1b85
Amazon
English title: Power and Modes of Exchange
Yukito Emaya
interchange format A story that discussed A-D, and after delving into D, thought that A-C should also be delved into, and came back to "power".
Transcritique (1990)
Seeing World History from the Perspective of Modes of Exchange" and "The Birth of Mode of Exchange D, which is Recovery at a Higher Level of Mode of Exchange A," described below.
Structure of World History (2010)
Reimagining World History by Introducing the Concept of "Modes of Exchange."
Das Kapital
Transition from production style to exchange style.
Marx thought that the mode of production was the economic substructure and that changing it would change the ideological superstructure of the state, but it did not
As a result, the idea that the conceptual superstructure of the state is independent of the substructure was strengthened.
Neither is correct. Karatani's argument is that the economic substructure is not a "mode of production" but a "mode of exchange.
Exchange Form D, which is "recovery at a higher level of Exchange Form A."
To return to A after experiencing exchange form C.
The mini-world system created by reciprocity of Exchange Form A becomes the universal republic of Kant by [Exchange Form D
The state is gone eternal peace.
For Eternal Peace
donation of a right of belligerency
D study (2015-2016)
Power and Exchange Style (2022)
I thought about the "conceptual power" of the exchange style.
A: spell power.
B: authority
C: capital power.
D: Their combined "power
Read "Power and Exchange Styles" by Yukito Karatani (2023)
nishio.icon
Traditionally, when people overcooked vegetables and food, they would "share" them.
In return for this is the exchange form A
As for digital goods, the cost of copying is low, so you can make what you want and then "share" it with the rest of the world.
This is the occurrence of [OSS
However, in the modern era, when exchange form C, the exchange of goods, is common, there is no "giving back" based on exchange form A to the author of the OSS
In other words, the problem can be described as "the dysfunction of Mode of Exchange A in a society where Mode of Exchange C is the norm.
So Form D, which is "to experience Form C and then return to the higher A," is the solution.
Related: How to deal with the tragedy of shared lands in OSS.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/力と交換様式 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.