cutting
GPT5.icon
The "cutout" in Scrapbox is--
rough definition
Refactoring is the process of separating specific topics from a "chain" of chronological chats, diaries, memos, etc., as new pages, and reconnecting them with the original pages by interlinking them. Refactoring is the process of giving a title (handle) to an unnamed concept to make it reusable.
Why do it?
It can be converted into a time series → topic-oriented for easy reference later. convergent move (aggregation of backlinks from related pages) occurs, and discussions tend to coalesce and develop. Comment elicitation: "If you are cut out, you will want to comment" effect.
When to cut it out? (Criteria)
When the need is clear: The moment you want to take it out/share it with other projects is the best time to do so.
The appropriate way to carve out a need is determined after the need has been identified.
When the search hits "in the middle": If the vector search hits the "thick part" of a long sequence, we take the opportunity to page it.
From the grown-up page: summarize the areas where the topic has grown and make them independent.
Tip: Glue the glue allowance.
A 2-3 line summary of the "flow leading up to it" at the beginning of the new page = glue.
→ A "step elimination/deburring" technique to prevent confusion due to contextual disconnections.
The from link (link to the original page) is the minimum glue.
The title should be created from the core (A), and the glue space (B) should be added as an introduction.
Granularity Pitfalls and Avoidance
Too detailed division increases the load on the reader. It is safe to let the AI handle the title and one-line summary first, and then let the humans merge/format them.
Materials that are worth reading through (lecture slides, etc.) should not be cut unnecessarily, but should be read "through" to retain their value.
Roles and Team Operations
There are roles for readers, writers, and editors. When there are multiple people in the role of "cut-outs," the circulation of "growth through editing," such as the addition of glue space, is activated.
Where to use AI
Vector search and red link extension to find "cut out" opportunities.
Automatic paging by leaving it alone" like Pioneer Mode -> finished by a human to eliminate steps.
However, we do not index rounded copies of search results (because the correspondence between title ↔ content is broken).
Working Template (5 minutes)
1. select the area to be cut
2. glue at the beginning (2-3 line summary of flow + from link)
3. give a title (name for an unnamed concept)
4. cut out in New Page, and link to each other
5. elimination of steps: addition of related links / tagging / one-line summary
6. create convergent moves with backlinks on the related page side as well
anti-pattern
Naked fragments without glue
Mechanical division for unknown purpose
Too much contextual restraints hinder development (glue moderation in the middle).
If necessary, make a rough draft of the example pages together with a "glue line".
__BELOW_IS_AI_GENERATED__
切り出し 2023-10-05 20:35 omni.icon
Digest 1
Summarize the discussion of the "cutout." The cutout needs a "glue line" and a summary of the flow leading up to the topic should be at the beginning of the new page. The appropriate cutout will be determined after the needs are identified. The cut-out page should also contain opinions from a different point of view than the original context. Also, people tend to want to comment when they are cut out.
Digest 2.
The following details the relevance of the fragments "glue is needed for the cutout," "needs are identified before the cutout is made," and "people will want to comment on the cutout when it is made." The "need for a glue line" indicates the idea that a summary of the flow leading up to the topic should be at the beginning of the new page when it is cut out. The "needs are identified before the cutout" indicates the idea that the appropriate cutout is determined after the needs have been identified. The "When the page is cropped, people will want to comment" indicates the idea that the cropped page should also contain opinions from other viewpoints than the original context.
deep thinking
Cutouts play an important role in organizing and sharing information. However, its appropriateness will vary depending on needs and context. In addition, reactions and opinions about the cut-out information may bring new perspectives and depth.
one-line summary.
Cutting out is important for organizing and sharing information, and the way it is done varies depending on the needs and context, and reactions and opinions bring new perspectives and depth.
Title.
The Role of Cutouts and Their Effects."
extra info
TITLES: ["Need glue to cut out"], "cut out after needs are identified", "chew", "digging through questions", "proper way to cut out is determined after needs are identified", "when cut out, you want to comment", "style of cutting out from pages you grew up with. ", "chewy explanation", "There is more than one person to cut out at the well", "De-"extract" theory", "Diary 2023-08-07"]
code:fragments
### Need glue allowance for cutting out
Need glue allowance for cutout
https://gyazo.com/6ac7c44886fb8381306e8175e7bd8ddb
B: [Duplicate and cut out only the parts that seem to break the context.
/villagepump/nishio.icon
The current Scrapbox cutout mechanism is style A
But wouldn't it be better to have a summary of "The flow of events leading up to the topic (blue)" (margin for pasting together (e.g. two pieces of paper)) at the beginning of the new page? I think it would be better to have it at the beginning of the new page. Otherwise, when you look at a new page, you'll be perplexed because you won't know why we're talking about it.
I saw [One well is not enough time or attention.
It's a cutout of my own diary remarks.
The person who wrote it didn't know what he was talking about.
Two lines were added at the beginning of the article.
Oh, that's a good word. That's the way to cut it out./villagepump/inajob.icon
+1/villagepump/nishio.icon
I'm also inclined to want the cut out page to contain a different point of view than the original context./villagepump/yosider.icon
### Cut out after needs are identified.
Cut out after needs are identified.
### chew on it
crunch
### Digging deeper with questions
Digging deeper with questions
### The appropriate way to cut out a need is determined after the need has been identified.
The appropriate way to cut out the need is determined after the need is identified.
I had said before that I wanted to organize it because I thought it would be useful, but it hadn't been organized./villagepump/nishio.icon
When I woke up from my nap, I was so cut out.
Maybe energetically /villagepump/takker.icon is cutting it?
### I'm tempted to comment when you cut me out.
I'm tempted to comment when they cut it out.
I'm tempted to comment when they cut it out.
Cut out and develop
transplantation
Room for roots to grow
The AI cuts it out on its own, sounds convenient./unnamed-project/inajob.icon
If a human kept writing endlessly on a diary page, the AI would do the cutting out.
[I'm tempted to comment when they cut it out.
### Style cut from the page you grew up with
Style cut out from the pages you grew up with
Style cut out from the pages you grew up with
Scrapbox is acut-out cost が低いUIになっている/villagepump/inajob.icon collaboration という意味ならあったと思うけど相互参照できるリンクの仕組みは見たことなかったので、発想はなかったかも/villagepump/基素.icon It's pretty easy to cut out UI-wise, but it's harder than you might think to figure out where to cut out./villagepump/Mijinko_SD.icon
[If you don't initiate the project, no one else will.
Feels like a kind of convergent thinking.
### Brief description
wordy explanation
### There is more than one person at the well to cut out.
There is more than one person at the well to cut out.
One of the reasons the well is working so well seems to be that there is more than one person to cut out/villagepump/inajob.icon
Not dependent on any particular person.
The cutting process itself is entertaining.
It's not so good when the diary just flows away.
The well-wisher's joint diary also gives the impression of flowing, but the best contents are cut out and become a page and stock information.
Is it a good thing that this can be done seamlessly in a well co-diary? ### De-emphasizing the "extracted" theory
De-emphasizing the "extracted" theory
extract" the interesting parts of the book. not good
The cost of trying to quote in good faith is inflated.
Most of the words that are impressive at first sight are often lost in context and unintelligible after six months. Instead of "taking a piece of the book out," find the coupling of your knowledge with the knowledge in the book and record it. ### diary 2023-08-07
It's easy to relate to the act because you get it right away.
But it's only as good as you can get quickly, so even if you collect a lot of them, they quickly scatter and become empty.
This is the reason why I'm not very excited about operating an English account.
I write for my own reading, so it will be optimal if it's written in a language I'm comfortable reading.
Putting it into English would allow "many people" to hear it, but I didn't want to speak to "many people".
So I can't find what I want to post on my English account on Twitter or on Bluesky.
Just stop trying to "talk" to unspecified people.
Enables you to hear
If there is a particular individual who has asked you a question, have a conversation with that one person.
I'm trying to figure out why I'm not excited about all the technical things we can do.
generated: 2023-10-05 20:35
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/切り出し using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.