社会認識論
DAN SPERBER, FABRICE CL ´EMENT, CHRISTOPHE HEINTZ, OLIVIER MASCARO, HUGO MERCIER, GLORIA ORIGGI AND DEIRDRE WILSON "Epistemic Vigilance" Another thought I had was that if you are looking for more convincing examples than the one with Catholic men, there is some very interesting literature from John G. Bullock on voter rationalism. He has made some experimental tests to see what political facts people from different political extremes believe in under different scenarios. When people are offered money for getting objective answers about political economy and political consequences right people from the far right and far left mostly agree on the facts. When no money is on the line they are very partisan in their beliefs about the same set of objective facts. There is something interesting here about what the right beliefs are, or whether beliefs are wholly dispositional and so just change under circumstances (this would have the consequence that beliefs are highly contextual and flexible).
polarizationについての対立する仮説
人狼の認識論理 / ベイズ確率論 / 認識ゲーム理論による分析
拡張された心 アンディ・クラーク