トマス・リード
#知覚の哲学
https://gyazo.com/728054a9d0a14353ea4cda8867f2fbe8
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reid/#WayIdeRepThePer
トマス・リードの「観念の途(way of ideas)」批判、おもしろい。
Here are three possibilities: (1) we are aware of external objects directly by perceiving representations of them, ideas; (2) we infer the existence and nature of external objects by perceiving ideas of them; or (3) there is no distinction between external objects and ideas, and, thus, when we perceive ideas we are perceiving external objects.
呉羽 真,小草 泰,藤川 直也 "知覚はプロジェクションか?――認知科学者のための知覚の哲学入門――"
リードの二重要素説
Indeed of the philosophers that have written about perception since the seventeenth century, I do not know of any Great Philosopher who even accepted Naïve or Direct Realism. (“Great Philosophers” in this period begin with Bacon and Descartes and end with Kant. They include Locke, Leibniz, Spinoza, Berkeley, Bacon and Hume. If someone wants to count Mill and Hegel as Great Philosophers, I will not argue the point.) 〔by ジョン・サール〕
terminology - Is Searle mislabeling his position on perception as "direct realism" when it's really intentionalism? Or are there non-realist intentionalists? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
トマス・リードはGreat Philosopherじゃないってこと