終局的帰属エラー（Ultimate attribution error）
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a3/Ultimate_attribution_error.svg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ultimate_attribution_error.svg#
The concept and term originates in an article by Thomas F. Pettigrew in 1979 as an extension of the fundamental attribution error which was identified in 1958. Since its publication, which at the time lacked a strong empirical basis, there has been some support for the theory.
The specific categorisation originally proposed had only some empirical support for broader categories of motivational and cognitive attribution. The bias is related to intergroup attribution bias. The attribution bias can be explained by group schemas. The grouping schema assumes that one will like and trust members of their in-group and dislike and hate are expected reactions to the out-group.1 The bias reinforces negative stereotypes and prejudice about the out-group and favouritism of the ingroup through positive stereotypes. The Ultimate attribution error is an example of a cognitive bias that shows cross cultural differences, showing up more strongly for individuals in Western cultures than Eastern Cultures.
Emotion is also known to influence the ultimate attribution error, shaping the way individuals attribute behavior to group members. For instance, emotions such as fear and anger can intensify negative attributions toward out-group members by increasing the likelihood of bad out-group behavior to dispositional factors, and good behavior to situational factors.1 This suggests that emotional states play a role in reinforcing the bias, especially in emotionally charged contexts like politics. Negative emotions may lead individuals to make harsher judgements of out-group members, further solidifying stereotypes and prejudiced beliefs. これそもそも単一の認知バイアスではないだろうNrem.icon
特定の結果や構図を指すラベルという風にしか読めない
Wikipediaにおいては英語版にのみ存在する項目
そもそも日本語の情報に乏しく、定訳が定まっていない
日本語の論文は見つからない。多分存在しない
「究極的な帰属の誤り」なる訳語がウェブ上に見つからなくもないが、これは不適切な訳語と判断した 関連