tkgshn as seen from blu3mo
Public.icon
blu3mo.iconI wrote down some thoughts I've had recently (there are some slightly negative ones, but there's no offensive intent) (let me know if there's anything that seems off). It feels like I'm receiving coaching
It seems like if the course correction of ② doesn't work, I'll be in trouble blu3mo.icon
Therefore, I think that exclusive moves that exclude legitimate criticism are dangerous
Certainly Previous companies, interviews and appearances related to oneself.icon
Specifically, I get the impression that criticizing others with the vague concept of "sense" is not a good exclusive move
Shouldn't we criticize more specifically? Previous companies, interviews and appearances related to oneself.icon
Here, as a kind of criticism, I mention the "points where C-Voxel (VESS) doesn't seem to be working" from the example of Gitcoin. This was done around last year, and @gitcoinpassport as a DID aggregator is really fired up. https://t.co/TTh6g4h7fl
@0xtkgshn0xtkgshn.icon December 24, 2022&t=AzvA3w0YRn7T9CkzwErIPw
I think this is good (although there's no such thing as good or bad in someone's move, subjectively) blu3mo.icon
This is partly because it's based on Coding's object-oriented and design's object-oriented are different. Previous companies, interviews and appearances related to oneself.icon
I think that arguments or criticisms based on vague concepts are both good and bad cult-like moves, and the problem is that if you criticize tkgshn, you can't expect a discussion blu3mo.icon
Actually, I want to propose the theory that we don't do exclusive moves that exclude legitimate criticism too much tkgshn.icon*2
Especially around here, I'm just using it as a joke
https://gyazo.com/03cd36be5dd0158b0d135417a134b711 https://twitter.com/search?q=from%3A0xtkgshn%20%E3%82%BB%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B9&src=typed_query&f=live
Coaching is something I can do, including Previous companies, interviews, and appearances related to oneself.icon, but when it comes to my own position, I feel like I don't really need to bother to hire a coach, so I would like the tkgshn from the perspective of 〇〇 series to have more writers from different backgrounds.
As something that is close to me, it might be Introducing People to Follow with Comments?.
Regarding machine learning processing, I also mentioned it in How I Learn in My First Domain #608e352c09c5f20000d43652.
@tsumikino_: I was thinking that people with ASD, who are supposed to be bad at communication, are more likely to have a deep relationship with people who have mastered human-machine learning (to some extent, by being considerate and inferring intentions). There are two types of things to convey directly in communication: things that are hard to say and things that are better left unsaid.
@tsumikino_: I think this is because humans are not good at distinguishing between the two. Things that are difficult to say are generally more likely to fall into the latter category. It is quite important for deep mutual understanding whether the option of talking about things that are difficult to say/hear for the sake of the relationship can continue to be taken, but there are not so many people who can do this, and it is easier for people with ASD to functionally deal with it in their brains.
There are still things I haven't written yet or I'm not sure if I should write here, but for now, here's a link to youkan-brain/SGG year-end party 2022 after the event.
This topic also came up at the event, but is there a message from blu3mo.icon at that time somewhere? Is everything on this page? inoue2002.icon
I feel like it is. Previous companies, interviews, and appearances related to oneself.icon
"Ethics" is necessary for people who can do both things equally wellPrevious companies, interviews, and appearances related to oneself.icon