"Methods for achieving the seemingly contradictory proposition of recognizing things that are not recognized"
Recommended for learning decision-making, history, geopolitics, and structure
They all seem to be talking about similar things
It seems good to also study neuroscience (psychology) and economics to support them
In the first place, I don't trust habits, efforts, or human behavior, lol
There is a problem with the structure
Mr. Fukatsu> It is also a UX design philosophy
"Please tell me books that are useful for UX/UI design." I recommend books on neuroscience, economics, and geopolitics. Realistic thinking can be quite useful.
The formation of countries and civilizations is the same
If the parameters around here are similar, the cultures will be somewhat similar
There is a sea or river
There is a forest
Temperature and humidity
I feel that many people become interested in learning geography after learning geopolitics. Geography at the stage of disinterest tends to become a memorization contest of specialty products in places where they will never go for a lifetime. https://t.co/5wnH7BEROF - Takayuki Fukatsu / THE GUILD / note (@fladdict) July 8, 2020 Lover> "Is it better to have a set of history and geopolitics?"
Exactly that image of tracing the source
I feel like most of the famous historical books are saying the same thing,
so I think you can read them lightly
(There are books with 5,000 pages, etc.)
"Japanese are incels, Americans are way" can be explained to some extent
Japan: Island country
Since island countries are basically assumed to be unified, there are not many wars in the first place
And it's better not to do it because it's troublesome if you do
The guy who goes to war is hated and dies
Everyone who doesn't go to war becomes a friend
America (China, Europe): Inland country
In the first place, war cannot be avoided if the land is connected
Since it is a zero-sum game, the only way to expand to the next territory is to continue doing so A lot of wars will occur
If you don't have a "me, me" mind, you'll be eliminated normally
The guy with the mind to go to war survives
The guy who doesn't go to war dies
Addendum: I was told that there is also the Great Japanese Empire and the British Empire, which is due to the fact that I don't really understand history myself. I want to find a better expression
Concepts like human activities
This is not a discipline, but a problem of thinking stance
Like a philosophical sect
People who are rough-tempered and easily go to war cannot survive socially
Well, they can't mate w
At first, even if a certain gene is assigned to any place, it will decrease by natural selection
As a result, it became like the personality of island countries vs inland countries today
Combining this with history doubles the effect
By thinking of it as a territory, you can predict the future.
By interpreting a company's business domain on the internet as a literal domain (territory) and analyzing it with a geopolitical approach, it is possible to predict the future with a fairly high degree of accuracy... This is a hypothesis.
As a premise, technology (technology) will continue to evolve.
It is important to separate "changing things (technology)" from "unchanging things (behavior, biases, physicality)" when considering them.
Therefore, I think it's okay to recognize neuroscience and psychology as unchanging things.
Talk about being able to predict the future
Remote work was predicted 10 years ago, wasn't it?
It was predictable in the context of human technological evolution that technology would become even stronger.
Like land losing its value
The value of money goes down, doesn't it?
The number of conceptual currencies (money) increases.
Facebook's Libra, for example. It's better to make your own money.
It can be circulated infinitely (that's what Meaning means by making it). If you can make it (if there is a circulating economic zone), you should make it.
I made a virtual currency when I was in junior high school, but it failed.
The currency had no value because I had no value that I could move on my own.
If you can give it value, it will become a currency.
Like shells.
I'm glad I understand the economic system.
That's why the money of developing countries is not very trusted.
Thanks to technology, the hurdles for payment and currency issuance (like Suica) have been lowered.
The essence of technological evolution is democratization.
Technologies that are currently valuable and can only be used by a few people will eventually be democratized.
What's more important is the "nature of maximizing the market." To make a profit in capitalism, you need to expand the market and continue to offer new things. Therefore, things become cheaper and performance improves, and the market size moves in the direction of expansion. Things that were initially exclusive to the wealthy become more and more popular, and even the common people and the poor can access them.
The biggest reason why technology is democratized is because there is a market.
This is the best part of a capitalist economy.
If everyone can create what they want, they can make money.
If you can make money, you can do other things.
= incentive to generalize
China is socialist, so there is not much incentive to generalize technology.
(Note) Please let me know if you know more about this.
Think of TikTok as almost state-owned,
and the reason why AI has developed so much is only TikTok (which goes against capitalism).
However, China is now almost giving up socialism (because AI technology like TikTok can compete even in capitalism).
I think socialism is taken as a defense against capitalism by China.
So while defending, they are raising AI (since AI learns from data, those who started earlier or already have a certain amount of data acquisition, in this case, users).
If that happens, no country or company can win, so TikTok was regulated in the United States.
Postscript: I think it's weird to separate China's capitalism and socialism, and I don't really understand it myself. I think it's better to think of it in terms of classical liberalism, neoliberalism, and Chinese-style socialism in terms of government intervention in the market. (Or rather, the Chinese government) (This area has low expertise, so it may be better to listen casually.)
War, in past tense probably won't happen again, mainly because nuclear weapons are literally capable of destroying the world. Not that there is anything meaningful about destroying the world. No one can use nuclear weapons anymore, because if they do, they will be used against them, and humanity will have no other option than to perish. It will be the end of the Earth. \n\s\s\s> "In the Second World War, atomic bombs were used as weapons, but what kind of weapon do you think would be used in the Third World War?" Albert Einstein, who was interviewed about this, said, "I do not know about the Third World War, but I know about the Fourth World War. It will be fought with sticks and stones." \n\s\s\s\s> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictions_of_the_end_of_the_world_by_Herbert_W._Armstrong#Nuclear_holocaust\n\s\s\s\s\s\s> This is a suggestive comment from Einstein that I like\n\s\sMy lover> How can we dominate in tech? \n\s\s\sMe> There is a concept of tech colony\n\s\s\s\sJapan is in danger of becoming a digital colony - Nikkei CrossTech Active\n\s\s\s\shttps://gyazo.com/38ea32cf83f16f2292a1f44036245267\n\s\s\s\s\sThis is a prediction from a good structure, like, "I don't know the word, but I understand the concept."\n\s\s\sWhen you make an in-app purchase on Apple, 30% goes to Apple and the developer only gets 70%. Recently, Fortnite was banned from the App Store because they were collecting payments through their own system instead of using the official one (to avoid the 30% fee).\n\n\n\sIt's the same with decision-making, with the ability to see the future or the structure allowing for judgments on seemingly invisible things. If we elevate the geopolitical perspective one more level to something like "abstract geopolitics" and treat it as a study that produces the best strategy within an inexorable framework, I think there is some potential, but there are few people who can share and discuss this theme.\n> --Takayuki Fukatsu/THE GUILD/note (@fladdict) July 9, 2020\n\n\n> Geopolitics, when highly abstracted, becomes a study of "what kind of behavior becomes standard under the immutable (or unchangeable) initial conditions?" Therefore, I think it can be applied not only to business, but also to issues of inequality and discrimination, as well as to problems in family relationships.