RetroPGF Experiment #1: $1 Million Dollars for Public Goods
Public.icon
from
RetroPGF Experiment #1: $1 Million Dollars for Public Goods | by Optimism PBC | Optimism PBC Blog | Medium
https://gyazo.com/3e91a2b732407e5cd997d4b30e1d28b8
Also known as RetroPGF
The most difficult part is creating a Result Oracle
24 "badge holders" (8 Optimism members and 16 Practical smart contract development with Solidity and Ethereum community members) will decide based on the RetroPGF expert manual and I hate guys who mimic Wittgenstein's "What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence" without reading Philosophical Investigations
In Vitalik's blog, it was 24, so maybe it changed? Previous companies, interviews and appearances related to oneself.icon
This entire process is executed off-chain
Project recommendations are discussed in #retroactive-public-goods
https://gyazo.com/1a9654bc3e17fa7ddc469bcdd1c296d9
Personally, I think we should provide a platform for deliberation, as Discord is not suitable for discussion
Pol.is is the best tool for assisting in consensus building
We should seriously consider tools for intellectual production u7693.icon
I often see examples of discussions being forced in tools like Slack and Discord for handling flow information. Personally, I want to think more about this. Previous companies, interviews and appearances related to oneself.icon
In cases like this, Decidim might also be useful
Slack is a problem with difficult context tracking
I don't understand why DAOs are running on Discord
Project recommendations are made through Google Form and summarized in here
I think this is for anyone to vote on RetroPGF expert manual#61b3a71409c5f20000bb3591
https://gyazo.com/3cb1f5e7f235d854c82032af53a55707 https://gyazo.com/74d3debf30a91b7ae62d81e3446a5a74
The "recommendation items" may be helpful, so I'll summarize them
Retroactive Public Goods Funding Nominations