When becoming an entrepreneur from being a product manager,
Public.icon
Civichat N High Entrepreneurship Division was successfully adopted and moved on to registration work. There are people around who are "starting a business (mentioned later)," "starting a business," or "doing CTO."
The word "entrepreneur" is not very essential.
Since starting a business is not the purpose, leave it alone.
I have experience as a PM in Nerugaku, but I am quite anxious about the position of management/president for the first time. If nothing happens in a few months, we should be founding a company. However, since there are many first-time experiences, I will write them down as notes.
I don't understand many words such as representative director, director, shareholder, ratio, etc.
I think this is the worst thing that could happen, so I want to talk to other people or study.
I would like to hear about failure stories first (rather than successful ones).
Try talking to your homeroom teacher, including such issues.
In creating a business (not just a product but also from the perspective of the company), is it possible to do things with high cost like "exam preparation-to-advancement"?
I think this university has a value that can only be found here.
There are some things I think about other universities, like "it's fun to go there anyway," but still, the desire to go to Minerva is incomparable.
There is a slightly-interesting research context with other domestic prestigious universities (University of Tokyo, Tsukuba), as well as overseas prestigious schools (IVY's).
However, since it is a rational world, there is a possibility of failing...
As a premise, there are infinite things I want to do.
Such as research
Studying English
Nerugaku's business is also currently in progress. In terms of career, people who started a business (started a business) while still in high school or university are not within the observation range.
1. Temporary leave of absence
"Can be returned to school at any time" is a benefit.
Re-entering (after quitting) comes with various costs
Saving on tuition fees is possible
2. Dropping out
Completely quitting, some people even write "〇〇 dropout" if it's a prestigious school, and it might be useful for networking
(although this is only true for schools like Stanford)
3. Doing both
Not widely observed
If you can only handle it to the extent that you can balance both, I think it's better not to do it too much (my personal opinion)
If it's just content, you can learn it personally
4. Can't do either
The worst case scenario, we want to avoid resource dispersion
As a related topic, it's like whether it's irreversible or not Is it a business that can only be done now (riding the wave)?
Is it a study that can only be done now (invited by a professor)?
There is relatively no irreversibility in both cases
It's possible to make a mistake in judgment when you're in a hurry and it becomes irreversible I got scared when I felt what happens when you start a company with the mentality of a student organization: one of the three founders left, too many adults were involved, only 51% of the shares were left, and there was a conflict with the representative, and the company was not growing and monetizing.
2. Anxiety about whether you can handle it or not
PM is an image of being responsible for a product or project
Some people even do PL and BS, but basically, among management positions,
1. Decide the direction of the company itself
Is this the entrepreneur?
I think it's about creating a vision that continues to generate profits there
2. Decide how much growth you want to achieve in the business (including profits)
This is where you start to mess with PL and so on
3. Decide the phase of the product
4. Implementation, PDCA
I have only done up to 2, "Deciding how much growth you want to achieve in the business (including profits)," so there are many uncertainties about what will change or not.
It's not just about "improving the product", but also about "continuously generating profits", right? I wonder if concepts like shareholders and directors are also related to this?
Civivhat may not need to be too concerned about this, as the only reason for incorporating is to be able to use the government's API. (Maybe that's actually a good thing?)
However, as someone who has been a PM for a while and has gained a certain level of resolution, it may be an asset to challenge from a management perspective and have the opportunity to fail and engage in PDCA.
Should we embrace failures that can be redone?