Has DAO made it possible for private entities to provide public goods?
Public.icon
Until now, public goods were provided by the government, but DAOs have value in that they can provide public goods from private entities. By the way, isn't this a proposition that cannot logically hold true no matter what?
Rather than spending time on secondary voting, is it more about putting out a better UI to the world? There is also the issue of what layer to call DAO. For example, is Ethereum a DAO? Is Uniswap? Is Optimism? There is still a problem of which layer of public goods to support, and I think it's a big deal that it has become a platform as an administration, not a big or small government, as seen from the fact that Ethereum has renamed L2 to consensus layer.
In this context, the next thing that comes up is the mechanism like "DAO OS" is basically supported by the public chain itself, so it's difficult to say how far a single service layer DAO can survive. To discuss this governance, I feel that we need to clarify what problems the autonomy ≒ local governments that we are currently most familiar with are facing.
Overall, I think this is a very good resolution that I have been able to think about so far.
Looking back at this, it's not true at all. tkgshn.icon*2
Ultimately, it seems like Optimism is the one doing all the hard work.