グループでの映画批評
のdirector)とEmma Kawawadaさんというクルド人移民を扱ったthe small landの監督を囲んでシンポジウムを行うという会に参加することになった。学長の藤井輝夫さんなど、名だたる大学の重役たちがきていて緊張したけれどなんとかそこそこいいものになったんじゃなかろうか。準備は8/6の9時から丸一日かけてやったのだけれど、なかなか「グループで映画を批評する」というのが僕には新鮮でなかなか難しかったなー。もう少し「書く」ための時間をとることができていたらもう少し変わったのかもしれないけれど。 Choices : Are They Really Yours ?
Choice — a word that suggests freedom, and yet is it something that we can actually afford or is it a luxury? In the worlds of JAPANI and My Small Land, choice is not empowerment but a quiet battle against forces that dictate every step.
Question1: commonalities
Choices are an illusion when you are a refugee; not always about free will but sometimes about survival. In My Small Land, Sarya’s life is shaped by war, laws, and social systems that push her into decisions she never truly made. Where to live, whether to work, how to define herself, these are framed as personal choices, but they are in fact controlled by forces beyond her control. Her father’s acceptance of deportation isn’t freedom but sacrifice under pressure. Yet, in moments with Sota—opening up and simply enjoying conversation—Sarya shows her quiet strength and desire to shape her own path.
Choices can appear voluntary yet be chained by necessity. In JAPANI, Bipisha’s parents’ move to Japan seems like freedom, but is driven by poverty and the need to secure a future — a decision that left her growing up without them. Her quiet rebellion — refusing to speak to her mother, resisting the idea of moving, and longing to stay in Nepal — became her only way to express the pain of being left behind, turning resistance itself into her choice.
Question 2: differences
Choices in JAPANI are framed within the intimacy of documentary storytelling. The raw, unscripted moments strip away any illusion that migration is a clean and hopeful process. The dilemma of the parents to reunite with Bipisha or continue to live apart shows the painful tradeoff between "a poor life richly” and “a rich life poorly”. Bipisha’s quiet resistance, her longing for home, and her conversations with classmates about whether money or love matters more reveal a child forced to grapple with questions far beyond her years.
Choices in My Small Land are shaped and stripped away through a carefully constructed fictional narrative. Sarya’s initial choice to hide her Kurdish identity, her secret part-time job, and her continued relationship with Sota all serve as acts of survival within a system that does not recognize her right to belong. The red handprint on the border sign becomes a symbolic declaration of her presence — and the later authoritarian erasure of that mark is a visual metaphor for how authority silences personal agency. Through calculated emotional beats, the film mirrors the way refugees must navigate every decision within boundaries drawn by others.
Question 3
Choices in both films depict immigrant families living real lives in Japan, not as abstract labor forces but as individuals. Yet their choices are tightly constrained by economic pressures. In JAPANI, Bipisha’s parents move to Japan to secure income and education, with her mother forced into illegal work, trading time with her child for survival. In My Small Land, Sarya’s father keeps working even after losing his legal status, and Sarya herself briefly turns to prostitution for money. These choices are shaped less by free will than by economic conditions and restrictive systems.
Choices to act like adults were made by children of each film. Bipisha talks with her classmates whether money or love is more important, which we do not consider as a conversation of a 9-year-old child. On the other hand, Sarya had to quit Badminton to secretly work at the convenience store. She was told by her father to look after her siblings as well as other Kurds. The unstable state that immigration and refuge put the kids in forces them to act overly mature.
Choices in My Small Land are embedded within a predetermined narrative structure. The detention of Sarya’s father shatters her ordinary teenage life and forces her to sacrifice personal dreams to take adult responsibility in the face of systemic discrimination. This sacrifice drives her deep personal transformation, giving her resilience and a clearer sense of identity. While JAPANI depicts families with at least some room for negotiation—painful though it may be—My Small Land portrays refugees stripped of legal status and basic freedoms, emphasizing the profound absence of choice.
Conclusion: Choices are crucial for a child's growth, fostering self-dignity and independence. Children, especially immigrants or refugees, lack the freedom to make choices in key life events or family matters, and feel helpless and disconnected from their identity and family. These films remind us that growing up in such contexts often threatens one’s right to choose.
Questions to ask the directors:
My Small Land ends with Sariya doing her prayer and showing a strong emotion.What do you want the audience to think about the ending of the film ?
To Professor Kharel: You turned 1,200 hours of footage into a two-hour visual ethnography. Even if nothing was staged, the way you select and arrange scenes still shapes meaning. So, can a documentary ever really be neutral? How did you deal with this challenge?
Sarya’s younger sister accepts her Japanese identity, whereas her younger brother calls himself an alien and has no identity at all. What explains this difference between the siblings, even though they both spent most of their lives in Japan?