footnote グローバルな国内総生産を合計で約10%増加させる
会議が形式的なセクターの労働時間の25%であり、25%改善されることができる場合、これはGDPの約4%です。労働力の検索とマッチングのコストに関する標準的な経済的評価は、GPDの約4%であり、人的資源に費やされるコストと同様です。これが50%緩和されると、GDPは2%上昇します（ビジネスサイクルの失業のコストを著しく抑制することは言うまでもありません）。最後に、経済学者によって追跡されたGDPの成長のほとんど（世界的には年間2〜3%）は、新製品の研究開発を通じた技術の進歩に帰せられています。これは、導入で議論した数字によれば、現在は民間セクターの約80%です。もしもこれが柔軟なイントラプレナーシップによって四半期ごとに25%増加することができれば、これは年間の世界的なGDP成長を0.5%引き上げることができます。 ↩
If, as noted in the chapter, about 50% of formal sector work will be remote and, as in this study, if team-building exercises increase team performance by about 25% (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220030881_Does_Team_Building_Work), if this applies to about half of formal sector work and if about half the benefit goes into cost, we should expect a gain of about 2% of GDP from improved remote team-building. If agglomeration benefits are about 12% for work facilities (https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/653714?casa_token=-ZDUGej5nB4AAAAA:UiEMkS_A8uBJgzBkH2TTsyeNQUc7SndHpUEM0ojEuhwbG-Lmlov4lPLdQBwUacG3bLYIZMi1TxY) and this applies again to half of formal sector work and can be improved by 50%, again we get 2% of GDP. If meetings are 25% of formal sector work time and can be improved by 25%, this is about 4% of GDP. Standard economic estimates of the costs of labor search and matching are about 4% of GPD, similar to the cost spent on human resources; if mitigated by 50% this would raise GDP by 2% (not to mention significantly dampen the cost of business cycle unemployment). Finally, most GDP growth (of roughly 2-3% annually globally) has been traced by economists to technological advance through the research and development of new products, which is now about 80% in the private sector according to the figures we discussed in the introduction. If the efficiency of this could be increased by a quarter through more flexible intrapreneurship, this could raise global GDP growth annually by half a percent. ↩