reductionism
https://gyazo.com/d3fdd9b637b30a597456acd7634b24a2
broad interpretation" is a phenomenon that I see often, but I realize that the opposite is also true. The other party only says "X is necessary," but you take the liberty of interpreting the narrower scope of "Y is necessary," and worry that your case P is not included there.
I've seen descriptions that pair "magnification" with "underestimation," but I think the synonym for underestimation is "overestimation.
There's another story mixed in with these two: "the relationship between the appropriate value on the valuation axis and the smallest value on the valuation axis."
As the opposite version of "expanded interpretation," which is a broader interpretation than the original scope, I think "reduced interpretation" is more appropriate.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/縮小解釈 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers. reductionism
The reason why we have thought that we can understand things in a reductionist way is because mankind is too stupid to realize the limitations of reductionism, and we finally began to realize that we are too stupid to understand when computers beat humans in Go, which has long been enjoyed as a game with a difficulty level that cannot be solved by reductionism. The computer finally began to realize that it was too stupid to understand.
I have always disliked people who claim that "humans are superior to machines" and wish they would be destroyed quickly, so I am glad that more and more people are realizing this and coming over to our side.
20170623
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/還元主義 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.