e/a and e/acc are false dichotomies
e/a and e/acc are False dichotomy.
The story is that although seemingly at odds, they are actually moving in the direction of "no redundancy" in common in that they assume that being efficient is a good thing, and this is a problem.
Whether e/acc (effective accelerationism) or e/a (effective altruism), the question is not whether it is accelerationism or altruism, but whether it is "effective".
from /tkgshn/What is FtC and FtC Taipei? notes like #657a1d5b09c5f20000478393
d/acc / False dichotomy
https://gyazo.com/9bbb3c4cddca7017358c55e0a411b8dchttps://gyazo.com/28a9fcc66cdc83f41ba2a74fc67bd954
Same structure.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/e/aとe/accは誤った二項対立 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.