blind spot card
The idea is to create a typology of the process by which a human being notices a blind spot and resolves it, so that when he/she is troubled, he/she can draw a card to solve the problem. This is a more abstract version of TRIZ, which was created by typifying physical patent documents.
We are aiming for a reasonable number of physical cards or pictured mugs in the end, but right now we are in the process of structuring it bottom-up (SEE Top-down and bottom-up) and are gradually structuring it by collecting examples where we have noticed blind spots or changed our perspective.
Blind Card Candidate
Blind spot card with no picture yet
2025-01-29
46: High probability of failure, but average good
47: When more variability is better
2024-06-13
45: Assumption that it is a circle
2024-05-13
42: Even if the quantity doesn't decrease, the percentage will.
43: Two non-orthogonal axes
44: Fill the lake with a glass of water.
2023-09-04
40: Interaction Attributes
41: Splitting up conflicts.
2023-07-28
38: Assumption that the top is single
39: barbell
I had written on 4/13 but didn't make it a blind spot card.
2022-11-24
37: There is not always one solution.
2022-05-25
36: Only large stones emerge from the water.
2022-02-16
The last update on 2021-10-22 was an attempt to make a tote bag.
In the process, A series of pictures of two people saying different things was created.
More and more have been added since then.
Whether to add a series of pictures of two people saying different things to the blind spot card?
I won't add all of them, I wrote them on the candidate blind spot card.
I was trying to make a new addition to Blind Card Candidate this time and saw this page and added
The blind spot card candidate page is dull and uninteresting, not good.
It's just a list of links.
What's not good.
The link alone is not enough information.
Is that the same for other blind spot cards?
Why "candidate" in the first place?
Because I'm anxious to shake the sequential number ID.
But it's unclear whether everything that's been sequentially numbered in the past is "of a quality that's up to par."
(6.3.1.1) If you don't know who your customers are, you don't know what quality is
Once you have a clear idea of the specific purpose, such as "to make a tote bag," you can then sift through the criteria for usefulness.
Sift through after the use is clear.
Undecided whether these blind spot cards will be randomly drawn cards as originally planned, or whether they will be readable, tote bags or mugs.
Then we can look at the candidates and add them if there's no reason not to.
Why did you assign sequential numbers in the first place?
Because we weren't using Scrapbox when this project started.
He felt the name of the card could change.
Referencing by name breaks the link when the name is changed.
So I tried to refer to it by number.
Tried to create a network structure of knowledge at a time when Scrapbox was not yet in use.
This is strongly reflected in the fact that the first blind spot card is Tree and Rhizome.
[Not a tree of knowledge, but a rhizome of knowledge
Can we use Scrapbox now?
In the process of translating the Engineer's Guide to Intellectual Production into English, I assigned unique numbers to the headings.
Because there are different pages in different languages that point to the same thing
Blind spot cards don't create value only in Japan either, so there's a chance they'll be translated into English in the future.
Let's keep the numbers.
Look at the candidates and add them if there is no reason not to "Then let's process them in order from the top of the candidate blind spot cards," I thought and looked at the first one, and it said, "This should be split into several.
It's a tasteless list, I didn't notice.
I've split it up and painted a picture, I'll give you some time to make an adoption decision.
I'm still having trouble rereading "Blind Spot Cards Without Pictures."
I thought it was "the manuscript of the blind spot card that had no picture at the time it was transcribed to Scrapbox," to be exact.
31: Both "is X" and "is not X" are compatible.
32: familial resemblance
33: Two non-orthogonal axes
34: There are multiple ways to compromise.
35: Move the good stuff.
2021-10-22
23 A set, not an element
24 Axis, not set
Cards that have been treated as blind cards for some time OR that were on the list of candidates but not numbered.
25: There is more than one conflict.
26: The bias of easy drawing
27: The fastest course is not the fastest
28: Not one way, but both ways.
Considerations:.
Even if you write "[blind spot card] candidate" on the side of the individual page, the link here is too big to be buried.
The trigger for consideration isn't pulled when you think, "I'll consider it later before I put it in."
Blind Card Candidate
29: Observation coverage issues
30: False dichotomy
2021-06-28
It's been a while since I looked at this one and said, "Where are the 1's and 2's?" I'm like, "Where are 1 and 2?
src
1 Tree and Rhizome
2 Top-down and bottom-up
I wonder if there should be a page called "List of Blind Spot Cards."
2022-02-16 I think this page is it.
And it appears with a picture on the Related Pages section below.
A listing page with just a list of lists is dull and uninteresting page.
Added on 2019-02-07 22 Effectiveness.
Added on 2018-08-11 21 more ""Why" is ambiguous."]
2018-04-29 Addition of 1045,1046
2018-04-22 20 additions Large and small relationships do not exist..
2018-01-31 19 additions Curse of the dimension.
2018-01-28 Addition of 1047
2018-01-16 Addition of 1045, 1046
2018-01-11: Addition of 18, 1044
18: Identifying things that are not equal and cannot be identified by increasing differences
2017-06-17: 17 additions A cylinder looks like a circle or a square, but it is neither a circle nor a square
2017-05-31: Addition of 15,16
15: Use yourself as part of yourself.
16: Learn from those with little knowledge.
2017-05-27: For now, 1-14 with pictures were ported to Scrapbox, and after 1000, they were put in Blind spot card with no picture yet for now.
2015-02-18: Manage in Github to see the change history of individual items
2015-02-17: 9-14, 1029-1030 added
9: The Place of Nothingness
10: Different things belonging to the same thing
11: symmetry (physics)
12: golden ratio (approx. 1.6180339887)
13: yin-yang taiji diagram
14: dialectics
2015-02-16: 1-8, 1000-1028, Published.
3: spiral staircase
4: Proceed in reverse, but the goal is the same.
5: It's one or two things.
6: You have to climb up to get down.
7: We'll work it out in another world.
8: Same" and "different" go hand in hand.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/盲点カード using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.