Should→why?
1
The "must" and "should be" statements can easily lead to thoughtlessness.
Why is that?" You may ask, "Why is that so?
#thinking #thought patterns #thinking
2
The assertion that "(reality) should be X" means that "in fact it is not X".
There is a gap between that observed fact and your personal belief that it should be X or that the state of being X is preferable.
So three "why"
Why is reality a NOT X situation?
Why is the state of being X preferable?
Why is there a gap?
They try to answer the question, "Why X?" with the simple statement, "Because Y."
But it's unnatural to have such a simple answer.
If there is a bug in a simple, small program, it can be easily fixed.
If it can't be easily fixed now, it's likely a more complex problem.
Words are one-dimensional and have limited expressive power. It is a problem with multiple elements that are intertwined in such a way that it is difficult to explain in words, and can finally be expressed by illustrating a correlation chart, etc.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/べき→why? using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.