Opinion traceability has two directions.

https://gyazo.com/d87d59a82163ea84f973674a47058060

It allows you to show that what is written in the report is based on "someone else's" opinion.

But no traceability in the direction from "original submission" to "final report".

I can't find out where "I" put what I wrote in the report.

1. traceability

Originally means "traceability" or "retraceability". It is often used in the manufacturing and food sectors.

It can be used for one-way tracing of "Report → Submit" without any discomfort.

However, "Submission → Report" is meant to indicate "where the impact appeared", so "traceability" alone is somewhat weak.

2. other candidate expressions

"Reference Relationships."

Emphasizes that the link is bi-directional. Similar to "cross-referencing" in technical documents.

Correspondence

Indicate where the submission and the report description correspond. Easy to understand for the general reader.

Origin Indication" / "Source Indication"

Nuances indicating where the submission was reflected in the report.

Visualizing Contributions."

From the contributor's point of view, highlight how his/her opinion was reflected. This goes along with the visualization of the contribution.

Impact Mapping."

Image to map how the original submission affected the final outcome.

3. expression of recommendation

relevance

---