Justification by mass statement
nishio.icon discertation seems to justify it by quoting classic instead of "what I think," but in our day and age, we might be able to pick a conflict headline or a quote from a "popular statement." gpt.icon
That is a very interesting perspective. Whereas discertations cite the classics for legitimacy, the possibility of utilizing "popular utterances" as a source of quotations in our time may open up new forms of thinking and discussion. We organize this perspective as follows:
1. significance of classical quotations (traditional discertations)
Use of Authority
Citing classics is a means of increasing the legitimacy of a claim on the basis that its author and ideas have long been recognized.
Especially in philosophy and literature, utilizing the authority of the classics adds depth and weight to the discussion.
Approaches to Universality
The classics are considered to have universal values and insights that transcend specific eras and cultures, and the discussion is based on them.
Educational Background
In French philosophical education, students are trained to read the classics and cite their contents to formulate arguments.
2. the contemporary shift to "public speaking
Reflecting Diversity
By quoting from contemporary "popular statements" rather than the classics, we can incorporate more diverse perspectives.
E.g., a wide range of opinions from social networking sites, online forums, and survey data.
Emphasis on empathy
While the classics are often technical and esoteric, popular statements are everyday, accessible, and likely to have broad resonance.
E.g., the quote "many people think this way" gives the reader a sense of realism.
Data-driven justification
Collect and analyze data on what the masses are saying and use it as the basis for discussion.
E.g., platforms like Polis to identify and cite the distribution of opinions and key viewpoints.
...
Redefining Authority
Position the voice of the masses as "democratic authority" rather than "authority" based on the classics. ...
4. practical examples
A modern version of discertation
Positive (Thesis): Quotes the opinion of the masses, obtained from social networking sites and forums, and initiates discussion.
Anti (antithesis): citing opposing views found on the same platform.
Giving a new point of view by integrating these opinions.
5. contemporary values and challenges
It breaks through the rigidity of the "classic citation format" to enable modern and dynamic discussions.
It is particularly suited for application in multicultural settings and new problem areas.
issue
The challenge is how to ensure the quality of the discussion, as statements from the masses may lack consistency and depth.
It is also necessary to devise ways to eliminate the effects of filter bubbles and echo chambers.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/大衆の発言による正当化 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.