Hatena2010-06-26
code:hatena
<body>
Reprinted from Twitter
>
I have been omitting comments of mere affirmation or agreement because they are not informative, but then I would have to mention them in case of denial or disagreement. Do I need to comment in agreement to go through disagreement? Wouldn't it be zero information if I rephrased what I understood in my own words instead of mere agreement?
<<
The least expensive way to deal with comments is to "let it all go by," but my ability to let it all go by is not good enough, so I can't put comments I don't agree with on the same level as comments I do agree with, and I end up going right into them. As a result, I end up having a lot of discussions with the person who wrote the comment I disagree with.
I guess the correct response is to agree when the comments are agreeable and go through the motions when the comments are disagreeable. It seems obvious when you think about it.
*1277532090*Reference Links
I thought I'd note the OCaml reference link you gave me on my blog, or better yet, I thought it would be a good idea to put it all together and have it jump from the sidebar of my blog anyway.
** OCaml
** Python
** Other
- ObjC: NSDictionary site:developer.apple.com and google something like
- Google CSS: position w3schools or something like that.
- JS: Looking for a good way to find out!
</body>
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/Hatena2010-06-26. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.