Enaction Journal Club
（企画中）
うーん
候補論文（考え中。とりあえず発行順に）：
Varela, F. J. (1991). Organism: A Meshwork of Selfless Selves. In A. I. Tauber (Ed.), Organism and the Origins of Self (pp. 79–107). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3406-4_5
Varela, F. J. (1997). Patterns of life: intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition, 34(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1997.0907
Thompson, E., & Varela, F. J. (2001). Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(10), 418–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2
Weber, A., & Varela, F. J. (2002). Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(2), 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020368120174
Luisi, P. L. (2003). Autopoiesis: a review and a reappraisal. Die Naturwissenschaften, 90(2), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-002-0389-9
オートポイエーシスとはなんだったのか？　何に成功し何に失敗したのか？
Bourgine, P., & Stewart, J. (2004). Autopoiesis and cognition. Artificial Life, 10(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1162/1064546041255557
Bitbol, M., & Luisi, P. L. (2004). Autopoiesis with or without cognition: defining life at its edge. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface / the Royal Society, 1(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2004.0012
Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, Adaptivity, Teleology, Agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-9002-y
現在のEnactive Approachを理解するにはこの論文の内容（adaptivityの概念）が特に大事。
Thompson, E. (2005). Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-9003-x
Froese, T., Virgo, N., & Izquierdo, E. (2007). Autonomy: A Review and a Reappraisal. Advances in Artificial Life, 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74913-4_46
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9
Barandiaran, X. E., Di Paolo, E. A., & Rohde, M. (2009). Defining Agency: Individuality, Normativity, Asymmetry, and Spatio-temporality in Action. Adaptive Behavior, 17(5), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712309343819
Di Paolo, E. A. (2009). Extended life. Topoi. An International Review of Philosophy, 28(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-008-9042-3
Froese, T., & Stewart, J. (2010). Life After Ashby: Ultrastability and the Autopoietic Foundations of Biological Autonomy. Cybern. Hum. Knowing, 17, 7–49.
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009
Egbert, M. D., Barandiaran, X. E., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2010). A minimal model of metabolism-based chemotaxis. PLoS Computational Biology, 6(12), e1001004. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001004
Fuchs, T. (2011). The Brain —A Mediating Organ. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(7), 196–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36611-6
Virgo, N., Egbert, M. D., & Froese, T. (2011). The Role of the Spatial Boundary in Autopoiesis. Advances in Artificial Life. Darwin Meets von Neumann, 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21283-3_30
Auvray, M., & Rohde, M. (2012). Perceptual crossing: The simplest online paradigm. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, JUNE 2012. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00181
Froese, T. (2017). Life is Precious Because it is Precarious: Individuality, Mortality and the Problem of Meaning. In G. Dodig-Crnkovic & R. Giovagnoli (Eds.), Representation and Reality in Humans, Other Living Organisms and Intelligent Machines (pp. 33–50). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43784-2_3
Di Paolo, E. A. (2018). The Enactive Conception of Life. In A. Newen, L. De Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition (pp. 70–94). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.4
Mojica, L., & Froese, T. (2021). On the spatiotemporal extensiveness of sense-making: ultrafast cognition and the historicity of normativity. Synthese, 198(1), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02240-7
Di Paolo, E. (2022, October 6). Enaction and dialectics – part I. Dialectical Systems. https://www.dialecticalsystems.eu/contributions/enaction-and-dialectics-part-i/
Hirota, R., Saigo, H., & Taguchi, S. (2023). Reformalizing the notion of autonomy as closure through category theory as an arrow-first mathematics. ALIFE 2023: Ghost in the Machine: Proceedings of the 2023 Artificial Life Conference. https://doi.org/10.1162/isal_a_00627
Di Paolo, E. A. (2023). F/acts: Ways of Enactive Worldmaking. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 30(11–12), 159–189. https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.30.11.159
もちろん参加者の関心に応じて調節できる。
もっと実験系を……とか。
新しくcosenseのプロジェクトを立ち上げて、そこにレジュメ的なのを作ってきてもらう。
そこに他の参加者もいろいろ書き込んでいい。
公開か非公開かは考える必要がある。
インターネットに転がっている日本語の情報がもつ影響力は馬鹿にできないのでどうせなら公開にしたい気持ちがある。
実名で公開するのに抵抗感がある場合は、参加者を半匿名化する（『圏論の歩き方』の「木屋町」「下鴨」「六角」みたいな）もありか。
でもCosenseは今のところプロジェクトごとに違うユーザー名を使うことができないので、すでにCosenseユーザーでかつ半匿名化するなら別のGoogleアカウントを用意してもらうことになってしまう。
全部の回が終わってから公開でも。