Effect of peacemaking of WW1/WW2
WW2
Explanation
Successful Effect
Japan peace constitution
Germany
four zones/bizonia/FRG/GDR, demilitarize, denazified)
Failing Effect
Cold War
Korean Civil War, foguht by Communists vs UN/US
militarized UN failing to stop the war
breakdown of the Grand Alliance
Yalta, Potsdam of Roosevelt vs Stalin
Responsibility of the Breakdown of the Grand Alliance
+territorial division
Arms Race
NATO vs Warsaw Pact
Structurebluemountain.icon
War name
Explanation
Successful Effect
Failing Effect
が良いかな
economic/territorial見たいに分けるのも、話がこんがらがりそうなので
いや、political/economic/territorial、ありかもな
まあでも最終的結論と分け方が関連あった方が良さそう
敗戦国叩く系と、平和生む系?
でもこれは表裏一体だな（この事大事そう）
Reference
Pearson Causes and Effects of 20C p100-
他の教科書も使える
ww1 peacemakingなら、move to global war
ww2 peacemakingなら、cold warの序盤
あと、peacemakingの教科書もある
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M9HdGZ1dnugCJUumcb6OoYIz-Gv1xxHTjhSirSTc5Gw/edit
https://issuu.com/cupeducation/docs/9781107613911_public
Phase 3で使いたい
Note
多分これもWW1 EuropeとWW2 pacificにした方が良いのかな
? Examine the effects of the peacemaking process that followed two twentieth-century conflicts.
? Examine the reasons for the failure of one peace treaty in the 20th century.
こっちの方が何書けば良いのか分かりやすいな