凸型処分と凹型処分

In a blog post titled "Convex and Concave Dispositions" by Vitalik , I observed the reinforcement of my theory that "the middle is bad" The middle is bad. The post discusses the concept of convex and concave dispositions and their implications.

In a tweet 0xtkgshn, it is mentioned that there is a situation where Policy A has good results, Policy B has bad but tolerable results, but mixing the two halfway is the worst. It is argued that a 100% travel ban is much more effective than a 50% travel ban.

Another tweet 0xtkgshn highlights the danger of compromising in political systems. It states that compromising can lead to ineffective and half-hearted approaches. The example of war is given, where attacking either country A or country B can lead to conquest, but attacking both countries with half the soldiers each would result in defeat.

In another tweet 0xtkgshn, it is mentioned that Vitalik has a unique perspective on the philosophy of how centralized a system should be. The tweet refers to DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) and emphasizes that they are not corporations, highlighting the importance of decentralization in autonomous organizations.

Overall, the concept of convex and concave dispositions and the idea that the middle ground can be detrimental are explored in Vitalik's blog post and the accompanying tweets.